RICHARD EDEN: Why Palace insiders are unimpressed by Harry's 'tasteless' attempt to claim his grandmother's support in his continuing 'crusade'

One of nan astir unedifying aspects of Prince Harry's feud pinch his relative has been his evident desire to declare ownership of his mother's legacy. Scarcely a reside aliases question and reply tin walk without a reference to nan precocious Princess Diana and his claims astir her wishes.

Harry's latest tv question and reply suggests that he is now trying to invoke nan representation of his precocious grandmother, too.

Courtiers I've spoken to successful nan past fewer days are distinctly unimpressed.

In past Thursday's question and reply pinch simpering ITV News analogous Rebecca Barry, Harry claimed that Queen Elizabeth had afloat supported his ineligible conflict against nan celebrated Press and had personally urged him on.

'We had galore conversations earlier she passed and this is very overmuch thing that she supported,' he declared successful a documentary, Tabloids connected Trial.

'She knew really overmuch this meant to maine and she's very overmuch up location saying 'see this done to nan end'.'

Sadly, nan Queen is nary longer disposable to support Harry's declare aliases contradict it. So, possibly it would beryllium instructive to look astatine her actions.

It is simply a tribute to nan precocious Queen's lukewarm relationships pinch her grandchildren that each 8 felt profoundly loved.

Harry, though, was convinced that he was successful immoderate measurement unique. For example, successful an question and reply pinch an American journalist 5 months earlier her death, he claimed that he enjoyed a 'special relationship' pinch nan monarch.

Preposterously, he declared he was 'protecting' Queen Elizabeth from nan group astir her, moreover though he had been surviving successful North America for much than 2 years.

Convinced he was, indeed, special, Harry had go progressively disappointment that he was incapable to spot his grandma successful personification to talk his plans to move overseas pinch his caller wife, Meghan.

In his bestselling memoir, Spare, nan prince portrayed nan Queen arsenic a frail, aged female manipulated by officials, to whom he gave a bid of childish nicknames specified arsenic 'The Wasp' and 'The Fly'.

In fact, arsenic nan 2 premier ministers she met conscionable days earlier her decease person testified, nan Queen was arsenic crisp arsenic a tack until nan end. And, moreover arsenic her beingness spot deteriorated, she was prepared to speak her mind – whether it suited Harry and Meghan aliases not.

For example, alternatively of backing their plans for a 'half-in, half-out' domiciled pinch nan Royal Family, she made it clear that Harry and Meghan, nan Duke and Duchess of Sussex, would not beryllium allowed to harvester a life of nationalist work pinch money-grubbing successful Hollywood.

What, then, do we make of Harry's bold caller declare that nan precocious Queen had supported his arguable ineligible run against nan Press?

Did she really return specified a gung-ho position of these things?

It was surely existent that nan precocious Queen approved a determination successful 2018 to frighten News Group Newspapers pinch ineligible action complete its evident deficiency of consequence to hacking claims – arsenic emails disclosed to nan High Court person made clear.

But Harry has besides alleged successful tribunal documents that his grandma knew astir a alleged 'secret agreement' betwixt Buckingham Palace and nan patient of The Sun newspaper, nether which – he claimed – nan royals agreed not to sue.

Not only was nan allegation powerfully denied by each sides, Harry's declare was rejected by a judge arsenic not 'reaching nan basal period of plausibility and cogency'.

One courtier I said to this week was acold from happy pinch Harry's 'tasteless' effort to declare his grandmother's support successful his continuing 'crusade'.

As he told me: 'There is thing distinctly 'off' astir it.

'We'll ne'er cognize what was said betwixt grandson and grandmother. What we do cognize is that we will only ever cognize 1 broadside of nan story.'

Harry's attempts to usage nan representation of nan precocious Queen for his ain ends is apt to beryllium viewed by galore arsenic distasteful – peculiarly fixed his disruptive behaviour successful her last years.

The facts speak for themselves: Meghan and Harry conducted an explosive question and reply pinch America's chat-show queen, Oprah Winfrey, moreover though nan Duke of Edinburgh was aged 99 and his wellness was deteriorating.

The royal mates made profoundly hurtful claims, including an accusation of racism against unidentified elder royals. By nan clip nan question and reply was broadcast, Philip was already successful infirmary pinch his last illness. Incurably sick, he died 4 weeks later.

The California-based mates spent nan pursuing 17 months until nan Queen's decease moving connected projects that ended up inflicting further harm connected nan Royal Family.

Just 2 months earlier our beloved monarch died astatine Balmoral aged 96, her 'special' grandson announced nan forthcoming publication of his 'intimate' memoir, Spare.

Shame connected Harry for now trying to usage nan representation of a grandma he did truthful overmuch to wounded successful her last years.

To motion up for Richard Eden's royal newsletter, click connected this link