After Quebec complains, Supreme Court justice recuses himself from Bill 21 challenge

Trending 4 months ago

By Staff The Canadian Press

Posted July 10, 2024 11:15 am

1 min read

 'More groups joining conflict against Quebec’s arguable secularism law'

2:11 More groups joining conflict against Quebec’s arguable secularism law

RELATED - Two much groups person joined a bid to get nan Supreme Court of Canada to norm connected nan constitutionality of Quebec's secularism law. Their determination follows that of a awesome Quebec teachers' national and nan English Montreal schoolhouse board's move to title nan law. They insist Bill 21 is rooted successful favoritism and mobility nan government's usage of nan notwithstanding clause. Global's Phil Carpenter reports. – Apr 30, 2024

A Supreme Court of Canada justness says he will not participate successful deliberations astir whether nan precocious tribunal will perceive an entreaty to Quebec’s secularism law, known arsenic Bill 21.

Justice Mahmud Jamal says successful a missive issued Tuesday by nan tribunal registrar that while there’s nary ineligible ground for him to recuse himself, he has decided to retreat to debar being a distraction.

Breaking news from Canada and astir nan world sent to your email, arsenic it happens.

Last week, Quebec’s lawyer wide and different groups called connected Jamal to measurement distant from nan lawsuit because he served arsenic president of nan Canadian Civil Liberties Association’s committee of board erstwhile nan group challenged Bill 21 successful Superior Court successful 2019.

Jamal initially said he had nary volition of sidelining himself from nan case, erstwhile nan rumor was first raised connected June 25.

Trending Now

In February, Quebec’s Court of Appeal upheld nan province’s secularism law, which prohibits immoderate nationalist assemblage workers from wearing belief symbols connected nan job.

Story continues beneath advertisement

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association and different groups person sought time off to entreaty that determination to nan Supreme Court, which has not yet said whether it will perceive nan case.

&copy 2024 The Canadian Press

More
Source globalnews
globalnews